In recent years, the legal profession has grappled with a critical issue of diversity. The challenge of fostering diversity within law firms is a complex one, with implications not just for the legal industry but for society as a whole. This article delves into the world of diversity in law firms, examining the legal basis for affirmative action, recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings, the challenges faced moving forward, and highlighting some of the best law firms for diversity.

Diversity In Law Firms

The legal industry, like many others, has struggled to achieve meaningful diversity in its workforce. Despite the heterogeneity in America’s population, the representation of minority groups within law firms has historically been disproportionately low. While the issue of diversity encompasses various aspects, including race, gender, sexual orientation, and disabilities, this article primarily focuses on racial diversity.

As of now, African American attorneys make up  5 percent of practising lawyers in the United States, despite comprising approximately 14 percent of the overall population, the same percentage as 10 years earlier. Other minority groups also face challenges in breaking into the legal profession, with only around 10 percent of practising attorneys coming from diverse backgrounds.

Affirmative Action

Affirmative action has been one of the key strategies employed to address the lack of diversity within law schools and law firms. Affirmative action programmes are designed to promote diversity and inclusion by providing opportunities to underrepresented groups. They aim to level the playing field and address historical disparities in employment. 

Law universities may implement affirmative action by offering scholarships or admission preferences to students from underrepresented backgrounds. For example, a law school might allocate a percentage of its scholarships specifically for students who are the first in their family to attend college, aiming to encourage individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds to pursue legal education.

In law firms, affirmative action can involve targeted recruitment efforts. For instance, a law firm may actively seek out and hire lawyers from underrepresented racial or ethnic groups to ensure that its legal team reflects a more diverse cross-section of society. This initiative aims to address historical imbalances in law firm demographics and foster an inclusive workplace.

US Ruling On Affirmative Action In Law

However, as recently as June 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a significant blow to affirmative action in college admissions, raising questions about its future in the legal profession. This decision has triggered a wave of legal actions, with the American Alliance for Equal Rights filing lawsuits against major law firms that have implemented diversity fellowships.

The legal battles surrounding affirmative action have taken an intriguing turn as conservative activist Edward Blum, known for his role in challenging affirmative action in college admissions, has now shifted his focus to corporate law firms and their diversity initiatives

Specifically, two major law firms, Perkins Coie and Morrison & Foerster, have come under scrutiny, facing lawsuits that accuse their diversity fellowship programmes of excluding applicants based on their race, a claim viewed as discriminatory.

These lawsuits demand the shutdown of the diversity fellowship programmes and argue that racial exclusivity violates Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibits discrimination based on race in contracts. Both lawsuits seek temporary restraining orders and permanent injunctions against the firms from selecting fellows.

Before Blum’s group filed a lawsuit on August 22 in federal court in Miami, Morrison & Foerster’s website explicitly stated that the fellowship was exclusively intended for law students “who are members of historically underrepresented groups in the legal industry.” However, this language has since been removed, and the promotional material now emphasises that applicants should possess the ability to “contribute a diverse perspective to the firm, stemming from adaptability, cultural fluency, resilience, and life experiences.”

Another law firm targeted by Blum’s legal actions is Perkins Coie, a globally recognised firm with over 1,200 lawyers. Perkins Coie also offers a similar fellowship program and has announced its intention to vigorously defend itself, asserting its unwavering commitment to diversity and inclusion. Additionally, Blum has extended his legal pursuits to include a venture capital firm called Fearless Fund, which provides support to Black women business owners in the form of investment and resources.

These legal battles have raised important questions about the future of affirmative action and the extent to which it can be applied in the education and the  private sector. It is clear that the legal landscape is evolving, and law schools and law firms are at the forefront of these discussions.

Challenges Going Forward

The legal attacks on corporate DEI policies are a response to the commitments made by companies after the murder of George Floyd, when many pledged substantial funds and efforts toward racial equity. 

The pushback against affirmative action and diversity initiatives by some conservative groups has created a political storm around diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts. Critics argue that these programmes are not only ineffective but can also lead to claims of reverse discrimination.

With conservative activists like Edward Blum targeting not only affirmative action in higher education but also corporate diversity initiatives, there is a genuine concern about the future of these programmes. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to limit the consideration of race in college admissions has provided momentum for legal actions against diversity efforts, making it increasingly challenging to strike a balance between fostering diversity and addressing legal objections.

This begs the question – is affirmative action still a relevant tool to promote equitable outcomes?


Keep up with the latest legal developments

Get updates straight to your inbox

Sign Up Now

Does Affirmative Action Work?

Affirmative action initiatives have achieved varying degrees of success in different countries. Some examples are highlighted below:


India has a robust system of affirmative action, primarily through reservations in education and public employment for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). This system has contributed to increasing representation of marginalised communities in these sectors. The reservation policy has led to greater access to education and employment opportunities for SCs and STs, improving their socio-economic conditions. However, there are ongoing debates about the need to expand or revise the policy to address emerging challenges and ensure that it remains effective.

South Africa

South Africa’s affirmative action initiatives, implemented after the end of apartheid, have aimed to redress historical inequalities and promote diversity in various sectors, including government, education, and the corporate world. Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policies, for instance, have encouraged companies to actively promote black ownership and participation in their businesses. These policies have had a significant impact on increasing representation of historically disadvantaged groups in corporate leadership positions, though the effectiveness and implementation of BEE policies continue to be subjects of debate.

United Kingdom

In the UK, law firms and universities have implemented affirmative action initiatives to address historical imbalances in representation. For example, some law firms have established targeted recruitment programmes to increase the number of lawyers from underrepresented backgrounds. Additionally, universities have introduced outreach programmes and scholarships to encourage students from disadvantaged backgrounds, including those from lower-income households, to pursue higher education. These efforts have led to greater diversity within law firms and universities, although challenges persist.

These examples demonstrate that affirmative action initiatives can have positive outcomes in addressing historical disparities and promoting diversity, but they also highlight the ongoing need for evaluation, adaptation, and debate to ensure their continued effectiveness and fairness.

DE&I Legal Landscape In The UK

Diversity programmes in UK law firms find their legal basis in various anti-discrimination and equality laws, as well as regulations aimed at promoting diversity and inclusion in the workplace. 

Key legislative frameworks include the Equality Act 2010, which prohibits discrimination on grounds of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation. This act requires employers, including law firms, to actively work towards creating a diverse and inclusive environment.

Moreover, the Legal Services Act 2007 promotes diversity in the legal profession and mandates law firms to publish data regarding their workforce’s diversity, including gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic backgrounds. This transparency requirement fosters accountability and encourages law firms to implement measures that enhance diversity.

For instance, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has set guidelines that obligate law firms to promote diversity and inclusion within their organisations. These guidelines encourage law firms to take proactive steps such as setting diversity targets, conducting diversity training, and reporting on their progress.

Statistics reveal the pressing need for such programmes as women and ethnic minorities remain underrepresented at senior levels in many UK law firms. While progress had been made, these groups still faced barriers to advancement. Diversity programmes provide a legal framework to address these disparities, fostering a more inclusive and representative legal profession in the UK.

Best Law Firms for Diversity

Despite the challenges and legal battles, some law firms continue to lead the way in promoting diversity within their ranks, not only in the United States but also on a global scale. These firms recognise the value of diversity and its positive impact on the legal profession, regardless of geographical boundaries.

While there are many excellent law firms committed to diversity in various countries, a few stand out for their exceptional efforts. For instance, in the United Kingdom, firms like Dentons, Linklaters and DLA Piper have garnered recognition for their commitment to ethnic diversity in law. These firms have implemented inclusive recruiting practices, employee affinity groups, and programmes focused on underrepresented groups within the UK legal market. Their dedication to diversity and inclusion extends beyond mere rhetoric, with tangible efforts to create a more equitable legal profession both domestically and in the broader international context. 


The issue of diversity in law firms remains a critical concern, with legal battles and political debates shaping the future of affirmative action and diversity initiatives. Achieving true diversity and inclusion within the legal industry is not just a moral imperative but also vital for ensuring equal access to justice and a fair legal system.

As we move forward, it is essential for law firms to find the right balance between promoting diversity and respecting individual rights. The legal landscape is evolving, and law firms must adapt to these changes while remaining committed to creating a more equitable and inclusive legal profession.


Passionate About Improving Diversity?

Discover Our Diversity in Law Guide

Learn More

Loading More Content