Pupillage interviews are dynamic encounters that can cover a diverse range of questions. While the list provided here is not exhaustive, it offers a glimpse into the types of inquiries you might face. Interviewers may intentionally challenge your responses to assess your performance under pressure.
If you find yourself unsure of how to answer a question, stay composed. Request a repeat if necessary or take a moment to gather your thoughts with a sip of water. The key is to remain calm and focused during the interview.
In addition to traditional questioning, pupillage interviews often incorporate practical exercises, offering candidates a unique opportunity to showcase their skills in real-world scenarios. These exercises aim to evaluate various competencies, including advocacy skills, presentation skills, ability to think on one’s feet, articulate arguments, persuade, analyze, and demonstrate awareness of current legal issues. Understanding the nature of these exercises and how to navigate them is crucial for success in the competitive pupillage selection process.
The nature of practical exercises varies between chambers, each designed to assess specific attributes essential for a successful barrister. These exercises may be integrated into first or second-round interviews, with chambers providing advance notice of their inclusion. Candidates should be prepared to face interruptions and challenges from the interviewing panel, testing their ability to handle pressure and maintain composure.
Example: Appealing a sentence in the Crown Court or presenting a plea in mitigation.
Format: Conducted either unseen or with limited preparation time (e.g., 15-30 minutes) before the interview.
Expectations: Simulates a courtroom or tribunal environment, requiring candidates to defend their position and articulate arguments effectively.
Preparation: Candidates may receive advance notice (one or two days) to prepare a written response to a legal problem.
Format: The interview panel poses specific questions relevant to the prepared answer during the interview.
Alternate Format: Candidates might receive the legal problem on-site, allowing a brief period (e.g., 30 minutes) for consideration before facing panel questions.
Format: Involves presenting one side of an ethical or moral issue or engaging in a discussion with the interview panel.
Expectations: Candidates demonstrate their ability to navigate complex ethical scenarios and present well-reasoned arguments.
Duration: Expected to last 5-10 minutes.
Notice: Chambers may provide advanced notice (e.g., 48 hours) or reveal the topic only 15-20 minutes before the interview.
Follow-up Questions: The panel may use the interview to ask additional questions related to the presentation.
Preparation: Candidates are given a fact pattern of a legal problem and a short period (e.g., one week) to submit a written analysis ahead of the interview.
Length: Similar to an essay at university (up to 3000 words).
Interview Questions: The panel may question candidates about their written response during the interview.
Coping Under Pressure
Expect interruptions and challenges from the panel.
Maintain composure, react positively, and stick to your points.
Simulating Real-World Scenarios
Recognise that these exercises aim to replicate the challenges faced in legal practice.
Demonstrate practical skills relevant to courtroom advocacy, legal analysis, and ethical reasoning.
Articulate arguments clearly and persuasively.
Be prepared to defend positions and respond to panel queries.
Understand the specific competencies assessed in each exercise.
Utilise the preparation time wisely, whether for written responses or oral presentations.
Successfully navigating pupillage interviews requires a combination of thorough preparation, strategic responses, and adaptability. By understanding the diverse range of questions and incorporating valuable insights, aspiring barristers can approach interviews with confidence and resilience. Each interview, whether successful or not, contributes to the journey of growth and development in the pursuit of a fulfilling legal career.
Loading More Content