What Does Jamal Khashoggi’s Murder Mean for International Law?
Estimated reading time: 3 minutes, 25 seconds.
Jamal Khashoggi. A journalist and known critic of Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed Bin Salman, his murder last October dominated news headlines across the world. Many were left wondering how involved the state of Saudi Arabia was in his death.
Khashoggi was last witnessed entering the Saudi consulate in Turkey on the 2nd October 2018 at 10:14 GMT. Surveillance cameras never recorded his departure from the consulate and he failed to meet his fiancée who was waiting for him outside.There is an overwhelming abundance of evidence which points to the premeditated killing of Khashoggi at the hands of Saudi Arabia’s government.
In accordance with international law, Saudi consular facilities in Turkey have certain privileges which means that Turkish authorities are unable to access them without the consent of Saudi Arabia. This has meant that Turkish authorities have only been able to coordinate with Saudi Arabia where consent is not legally essential.
However, the President of Turkey, RecepTayyip Erdogan, has recently shown signs of seeking further international support so that they can respond to the death of Jamal Khashoggi more strongly. If this was achieved, this could pose a serious challenge to the close relationship between Trump and Saudi Arabia.
Intriguingly, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo stated that “The killing, the murder of Jamal Khashoggi in the consulate in Turkey violates the norms of international law. That much is very, very clear”. Contrarily, President Trump seems unwilling to punish Saudi Arabia for the murder of Khashoggi. This may be attributed to the USA’s international relations policies towards the Middle East, which are heavily reliant on Saudi Arabia.
Take 30 seconds to sign up to TLP and you’ll receive free, tailored information for your aspirations and stage straight to your inbox, as well as be the first to know about new, free events – what are you waiting for?
The imposing of sanctions and punishing of its rulers could damage international relations between the two powers, ultimately weakening “Washington’s strategic position in the region and offer an opening to rival powers”. It bears mentioning that the US President, along with his son-in-law Jared Kushner, have invested large amounts of money in order to gain the support of the Saudi royals.
Saudi Arabia’s agreement to allow the consulate to be searched illustrates the pressure that they feel to cooperate, or else risk appearing more culpable for the crime. Trump’s reluctance to outwardly punish Saudi Arabia, despite US allies such as the UK strongly condemning the actions of Saudi Arabia, further shows how far the US President is prepared to “sacrifice his own credibility” to maintain relations with Saudi Arabia.
Whatever sanctions Turkey chooses to impose, this will most likely provoke a response from Saudi Arabia which could have devastating consequences on international law. This way, it seems that the risks of a strong response to the Khashoggi murder outweigh the benefits.
The Khashoggi murder seems to have tested the limits of complying with international law and maintain relations. The underlying question behind this issue is therefore: will Riyadh cooperate with Turkey if the Turkish President does intend to impose sanctions on Saudi Arabia, in compliance with international murder?
Previously, the Saudi Prince demonstrated his sensitivity to criticism from leaders across the world, as can be observed from the cutting off of diplomatic relations with Canada.
Taking the LNAT soon?
We have application experts on hand who can walk you through the mechanics of the LNAT exam, and equip you with the strategies you need to score highly. Book an LNAT session today!